Context is the anchor that keeps Bible study from drifting into speculation. Every verse has a setting: who wrote it, to whom it was written, what was happening historically, and what came before and after. Pulling a single phrase without its frame can lead to contradictions or even false doctrines. For example, James 2:24 says a man is justified by works, while Romans 3:28 declares justification by faith without works. At first glance, these clash-but context shows James is addressing Israel's faith under law, while Paul is revealing justification in Christ apart from law in this dispensation.
Interpreting scripture with scripture means letting the Bible explain itself. God's Word is a unified whole, and comparing passages sheds light on difficult texts. Paul himself appealed to the Old Testament to confirm truths ( Romans 4 using Abraham as an example). This method guards against personal bias by ensuring one verse is not isolated, but harmonized with the rest of God's revelation.
Without context and cross-referencing, readers may force their own meaning into the text. But with them, clarity emerges, and God's progressive revelation becomes plain: Israel's promises remain, while the Body of Christ has its distinct calling. In short, context and comparing scripture with scripture protects truth, sharpens understanding, and preserves God's intended message.
Hello everyone, as I can't help but interfere in your conversation.
Works are equal to fasting for the salvation of people, we have works that promote the kingdom of God. We have works that look good. We have works that clearly show that we are of a Heavenly people. All of these are works. We have works that we must do and works that are for the Lord Jesus. He also did works. Healings and expulsions, and mm. And many served Him, the actions that were done are works. (Should we sit and twiddle our thumbs or just lie on our backs and do nothing. Now Spiritually we have many works we CAN do for the Lord. Pray is one of them remember Eph 6:12 We do not do it in a work of law. But in the freedom that Jesus Christ has set for us).
Paul is the Apostle of the Gentiles, but you see how many Jews have been saved by Paul's words afterwards! The word is free for all. There is no difference here. He writes so that people understand. Remember that in the covenant and the law there was no law with deviation. The freedom everyone has received through the new covenant. Must be difficult to understand for those who have lived for generations with laws they cannot keep. Of course the people of Israel had to do as best they could! No one could have done this diffrently.
When we come to the Spiritual, there are people who do not lift a finger unless they are seized by the spirit. That is good and completely right. If they do! Personally, I think that many have great confusion about this. Because doing the right thing for the Lord can be and not go in itself. But go for the Lord. Paul says that we must test everything, including the spirit. I think we must be patient and wait on the Lord. In the time that He has determined, He reveals things to us. Until then, we must wait, and wait, and wait even longer. Or do something so that we get attention. It is a choice every day. We can ask ourselves whether we are following the Lord or leading the Lord. But enough from me. Go on, love you all
All sound doctrine can be likened unto the bones of the body . Each having its function and each in its right pisition and relationship with the others .
Taking one doctrine the dispensations of God for instance cannot be denied for they are clearly taught . But you change the truth into a lie when you try to read all the scriptures by that one doctrine . For not all Scripture will or can fit into it and sooner or later you will have to " twist the scriptures" to make them fit .
Predestination is another in truth every " ISM " can be proven to be wrong yet founded upon a truth taken out of shape and context of "all scripture ".
False and heretical doctrines are usually founded upon one at most two verses and a mountain of error is built upon them that ignore and deny so many other scruptures that prove them wrong .
The Roman church is sadly a master at such convoluted reasoning .
The obvious one upon which the edifice of its own making is that Peter was the rock upon which the church is built but ignores and denies all the scriptures that prove that " God is the Rock" .
And you cannot build an eternal church on a son of Adam but you can build a church on "The only begotten Son of God".
He made the mistake of tninking the light that he had and was given of heaven was all the light . And when the Lord began to give more light denied it and began to instruct the Lord . To the extent that the Lord rebuked him severely " get behind me Satan" the man that had at one moment spoken words of heaven with the next breath became a spokesman of hell and the devil . God in his love and wisdom laid out all of Peters weaknesses and failings in every sphere for our sakes .
Not many would have stayed after such an open rebuke (.Justas did not . )
Peter even acknowledging that the doctrines of Paul were not always "easy to understand "
Etc etc .
Even more tragically Rome has added to her false doctrines and now claims she is infallible in them
To what purpose ? " Till we all come to a unity of THE faith " if faith comes by understanding the Word of God then as he said that we might all "think the same thing " have the same mind " what mind ? If not that of the " Holy Sprit who knoweth the mind of God"L
For are not words expression of thought? If then Gods thought are higher than our thoughts the Holy Spirit is needed as much to understand what was inspired to be written .
The art of biblical argument has sadly it seems declined and been with tick box doctrine statements like TULIP .
I have read but little of Calvin but enough to see and understand his use of z biblical argument as did many other Reformers .
But many have simply jumped to conclusions about what they think he said rather than follow his arguments and indeed more importantly Paul's .
But if you jump to conclusions you rarely if ever arrive at the truth .
Shepherds in England drive the sheep with dogs . In the middk east the shepherd leads them and they follow .
When the Holy Spurit comes the Spurit of truth "He will lead us into all truth"
Given so many 'versions' of the Bible all saying different from each other omitting and adding to the scriptures and an awful bad habit of subjecting the scriptures to nans intellect rather than the other way round the church is riddled with confusion and is much skin Tom" all we ,Ike sheep have gone astray.." The Holy Spirit of Truth is o in the meantime "outside knocking on the door ". Rev 3
And while many boast in revivals and thec" anointing" there is very little evidence for both for the eternal resting p,ace of the Holy Spirit is the Word of God . The living Word even that which was in the beginning .
For if a man cannot be heard or understood unless he gives his breath or life to those words how much the more the Word of God that comes forth from His mouth?
Others boast in their 'better understanding ' but by their works / versions prove they have very little .
You've made some allegations that I find unfounded considering that I have been diligent to include scripture supporting my beliefs. You on the other hand have not done so.
So, I"ll try to clear the air regarding your concern. From what you've shared, it seems you believe I am not relying on sound doctrine and that I am making the claim that only Paul's doctrine applies to us today.(Regarding Paul this is true). However my intention is not to dismiss the rest of Scripture, but rather to highlight Paul's unique role as the apostle to the Gentiles. Sound doctrine requires us to recognize distinctions in Scripture, and part of that includes understanding that Paul was given specific revelation for the Body of Christ in this present dispensation.
I hold firmly that all of Scripture is God-breathed, profitable for learning, and necessary for understanding God's full plan. However, when it comes to our instructions for daily living and the gospel of salvation in this age of grace, Paul's writings carry special weight because they were directly entrusted to him for the Church (can you really deny this?). This is not a rejection of the law, prophets, or the twelve apostles, but an acknowledgment of the stewardship of the "mystery" revealed to Paul ( Ephesians 3:2-9). Ignoring this distinct calling blurs the lines between God's promises to Israel and His present work in the Body of Christ.
Sound doctrine, therefore, means using Scripture rightly divided. We can honor the whole Bible without mixing programs that God Himself keeps distinct. My emphasis on Paul's doctrine is not narrowness, but fidelity to what was committed to him "for us." If this has come across as exclusionary, that was not my intent-it's about clarity, not division. I hope this helps explain why I stress Paul's role without denying the value of all the Word.
Taking scripture out of context is a pretext for error .
One swallow does not make a summer so also one verse does not prove a doctrine . Many a religious has built a mountain of heretical doctrine upon one verse . A doctrine is proved by " all scripture " using all scripture to examine the one verse and reconcile it. Not using one verse to try and fit all scripture to that one doctrine .
For " should doctrine " are like the bones of the body . Each in their place and each with its function working together .
Having said all that we must also recognise the Biblical argument . Which using verses in their right context and to uphold an 'argument' as and when they apply . There is really no such thing as a 'proof text' so often used but unable to prove anything all on its own . Though it can be used to challenge an assertion that cannot be upheld by scripture . ' Man has the right to life' for instance a Godless and vain assertion that denies the very simple truth that a " man's life is in his nostrils" .But just quoting texts at each other neither gives understanding in the one you perceive has none or little on a subject .
The finest examples of Biblical argument are those given by Paul principally in his letters to the Romans and the Hebrews.
There you will find an argument much like a legal one in an appeal courts ruling.
Where he seeks us to follow his argument . To what end ? That if we follow his argument and understandably agree we will arrive at the same conclusions. It's like climbing a mountain where you start ' seeing' little but as you climb every so often you stop to take a breather. And look back to see where you have come so far and Paul uses those breaks and says " therefore" in the light of all that's been said so far " count yourself dead to sin." For instance
He uses it often . But we find every so often and when needed to bolster his argument he will use a verse of scripture as anchors to our thinking .
I've appreciated what you have shared here Lbooth1955 and in agreement that we need to consider the Bible in its entirety, rightly divided, to learn its Truths and the correct application of them in our lives and ministries.
So when we come to James 1:1, we should correctly believe that James is addressing Israel's twelve tribes scattered into other lands. But when we read James 2:1, he gives us insight as to who these people actually are: "My brethren, have not the faith of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Lord of glory, with respect of persons." Yes, they are his kinsmen by blood, but also joined to them by faith in Christ. It seems, even as Apostle Paul also writes in his epistles, that their heart-strings are still very much attached to and in great concern for their people, but that is only in reference to those of Jewry who are believers, one with them in faith and Spirit. Given all this, would you still maintain that James was written to the unbelieving scattered tribes of Israel?
Regarding James, I must have misspoken or maybe not clear on my standing.
I'll try to give some clarity here.
James 1:1 declares, "James, a servant of God and of the Lord Jesus Christ, to the twelve tribes which are scattered abroad, greeting." The audience is unmistakably Israel. James is writing to the twelve tribes, not the Body of Christ. These were believing Jews dispersed outside their land. Dispensationally, this aligns with God's prophetic and kingdom program, not the mystery revealed to Paul. The letter prepares the scattered remnant for endurance under trial (1:2), looking toward tribulation and kingdom promises. The timing is before Paul's mystery truth became central, fitting the framework of Israel's ongoing kingdom offer.
James 2:1 continues, "My brethren, have not the faith of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Lord of glory, with respect of persons." The "brethren" are the same Jewish believers, Israel's faithful remnant. The teaching flows from kingdom law, echoing Christ's Sermon on the Mount: impartiality, humility, and mercy. Their faith is kingdom faith in Messiah as Lord of glory, awaiting His earthly reign. This is not Paul's justification by faith apart from works ( Romans 3-5). Rather, James stresses faith validated by works (2:14-26), a hallmark of the kingdom program. Genuine allegiance to Messiah must show itself outwardly as proof during testing.
In comparison, James 1:1 defines the scope: the audience is Israel's twelve tribes. James 2:1 exhorts them in their kingdom walk. Both confirm James is not doctrinally written to the Gentile Body of Christ but to Israel under prophecy. Paul's letters, not James, unfold the gospel of grace and truth of the Body in this dispensation.
If you want some in depth Bible study on dispensationalism and have time to sit down and watch teachings generally ranging from 45 minutes to an hours long look up Grace ambassadors on YouTube. He has some wonderful teachings there.
Galatians 2:7-9 - Clear distinction: "the gospel of the circumcision" committed to Peter, "the gospel of the uncircumcision" committed to Paul.
In summary: James addresses believing Jews within the kingdom program, while Paul's epistles reveal the mystery program forming the Church, the Body of Christ. Two gospels, not contradictory, but distinct according to God's dispensational plan.
I believe I understood you correctly other than you calling me Chris.
However your replies came to my inbox so I'm sure I'm the recipient.
I agree on much you have said but I believe Paul in ( Eph. 3:1-9) includes all the Apostles in the knowledge of the mystery of Christ as seen in verse 5
"Which in other ages was not made known unto the sons of men, as it is now revealed unto HIS HOLY APOSTLES and prophets by the Spirit;
Also in Acts 15:7-11 at the counsel in Jerusalem Peter makes that clear.
In verse 11 Peter says something that suggests that stands out to me concerning future salvation requirements preached by the 11 for their audiences. (Jews)
Vs 11. "But we believe that through the grace of the Lord Jesus Christ we shall be saved, even as they."
I believe what Peter is saying in the same way the gentiles is saved. We shall be saved in that same manner. faith.
The mystery is that God's plan of salvation now includes Gentiles as well as Jews, uniting them into one body, the Church. Yes I believe that is Paul's primary message to disperse but I believe that mystery was eventually revealed to all the Apostles.
John the baptist also introduced Christ to Israel in a way that he brings forth Christ as this mystery unfolding in John 1:7-9. also in John 1:11-13 and John 1:29.
On to James.
In James I believe he's saying faith is being exhibited by works as proof.
I don't believe he's saying works is required to be contributed to salvation.
Both believing Jews under the prophetic program and members of the Body of Christ responded in faith to God's Word, yet the identity, destiny, and message of these groups were distinct. The Jews to whom James wrote ( Jas. 1:1; 2:1) were part of Israel's covenantal framework. Their hope was tied to promises made to the fathers and the establishment of a kingdom on earth under Messiah's reign ( Acts 3:19-21). Their identity was rooted in the twelve tribes, and their faith was demonstrated by obedience-works that showed living faith, preparing them for Israel's national restoration ( Jas. 2:21-24).
The Body of Christ, revealed uniquely through Paul, has a different identity altogether. Composed of Jew and Gentile made one new man ( Eph. 2:14-16), this Body is not bound to Israel's covenants but to the revelation of the mystery ( Eph. 3:1-9). Their destiny is heavenly, with blessings "in heavenly places in Christ" ( Eph. 1:3), and their message centers on the gospel of grace-salvation apart from works, by faith alone in Christ's finished work ( Rom. 3:28; Eph. 2:8-9).
Thus, while both groups believed God and received His Word, the dispensational distinction safeguards the clarity of Scripture. Israel looks for a restored kingdom on earth under Christ the King; the Body of Christ looks to a heavenly calling under Christ the Head. The same Lord, but different programs, promises, and purposes.
As you can probably tell, I am a dispensationalists all so.
I haven't studied much on the kingdom Gospel but I am very aware of it and it's distinction from the mystery later presented by the Apostles, Primary Paul.
Your presentation rung bells.
It's obvious there were OT saints saved under Israel's covenantal framework, where faith was "DEMONSTRATED" by obedience to God's commands.
They were persuaded by the Spirit of Christ and demonstrated it by their works.
1 Peter 1-13 declares the Gospel of grace was preached to the OT prophets with Christ as the author and finish work of their faith.
Verses 9-13 most noticeable.
Receiving the end of your faith, even the salvation of your souls.
Of which salvation the prophets have enquired and searched diligently, who prophesied of the grace that should come unto you:
Searching what, or what manner of time THE SPIRIT OF CHRIST WHICH WAS IN THEM did signify, when it testified beforehand the sufferings of Christ, and the glory that should follow.
Unto whom it was revealed, that not unto themselves, but unto us they did minister the things, which are now reported unto you by them that have preached the gospel unto you with the Holy Ghost sent down from heaven; which things the angels desire to look into.
Wherefore gird up the loins of your mind, be sober, and hope to the end for the grace that is to be brought unto you at the revelation of Jesus Christ;
The Gospel was preached!
What was left out is the mystery "that the Gentiles should be fellowheirs, and of the same body, and partakers of his promise in Christ by the gospel:
The old testament saints was saved looking forward to the grace that shall come in their Messiah and they demonstrated that by their works in their covenantal framework.
James' readers were indeed believers, but the framework of their belief must be understood dispensationally. James 2:1 affirms they had "the faith of our Lord Jesus Christ," yet James 1:1 makes clear his epistle is written "to the twelve tribes which are scattered abroad." This indicates Jewish believers under Israel's prophetic program, not the Body of Christ formed through Paul's revelation of the mystery. Their faith was genuine, but it was linked to the promises given to Israel concerning the coming kingdom.
Dispensational truth shows two distinct ministries: Paul, entrusted with the "dispensation of the grace of God" ( Eph. 3:2), reveals the gospel of the uncircumcision-salvation by grace through faith alone, apart from works or covenant promises ( Rom. 3:28; Eph. 2:8-9). In this gospel, Jew and Gentile are united into one Body ( Eph. 2:14-16). James, however, operates within Israel's covenantal framework, where faith was demonstrated by obedience to God's commands, such as Abraham offering Isaac or Rahab receiving the spies ( Jas. 2:21-25). These "works" did not replace faith but evidenced a living faith expected of Israel as she prepared for her promised kingdom ( Acts 3:19-21).
Thus, James' audience were true believers but not members of the Body of Christ revealed through Paul. They were saved within Israel's prophetic program, awaiting the earthly kingdom. Paul's audience, by contrast, belongs to the Body, a heavenly people with a distinct calling. Dispensationalism preserves this distinction, avoiding confusion between the prophetic promises to Israel and the mystery program revealed to Paul. Both groups believed God's Word to them, yet their identity, destiny, and message were not the same.
James 2:18 declares: "Yea, a man may say, Thou hast faith, and I have works: shew me thy faith without thy works, and I will shew thee my faith by my works." James addresses "the twelve tribes scattered abroad" ( James 1:1), pointing directly to Israel in dispersion. His message continues Israel's covenant program, where faith must be evidenced by works as proof of loyalty to God's promises. This aligns with the prophetic requirement that obedience secured covenant blessing ( Deut. 28).
James stresses that a faith without works is "dead" ( James 2:17). His examples are Abraham, who demonstrated faith by offering Isaac ( James 2:21-23), and Rahab, who showed faith by sheltering the spies ( James 2:25). Both lived under Israel's program, where covenant faith was confirmed through outward deeds. This context differs from Paul's later revelation to the Body of Christ. Paul writes: "To him that worketh not, but believeth on him that justifieth the ungodly, his faith is counted for righteousness" ( Rom. 4:5). He too cites Abraham, but from Genesis 15:6-when he simply believed God before Isaac was offered.
Dispensationally, there is no contradiction. James applies Genesis 22, highlighting faith proven by action, consistent with Israel's prophetic expectation and even Christ's own teaching: "Let your light so shine before men" ( Matt. 5:16). Paul, however, reveals the "mystery" of justification apart from works ( Rom. 3:28; Eph. 2:8-9), given uniquely to the Body of Christ.
Thus James 2:18 fits Israel's covenant framework, while Paul's writings explain salvation under grace today. Both are true, but for different dispensational purposes.
Continuing on with scripture and verse you have referenced about John.
John the Baptist's role is to present Christ to Israel within the framework of prophecy, yet his words carry foreshadows that later unfold in Paul's revelation of the mystery. In John 1:7-9, John comes to bear witness of the Light, pointing Israel to their promised Messiah. This ministry is clearly part of Israel's prophetic program ( Isa. 9:2; Mal. 3:1). Yet the phrase "that all men through him might believe" hints at a wider purpose, though not explained in that time. Gentile inclusion would remain unrevealed until Paul received the dispensation of grace ( Eph. 3:2-6).
In John 1:11-13, Christ "came unto his own, and his own received him not." Israel as a nation largely rejected Him, but a believing remnant received Him by faith and were given authority to become sons of God. This aligns with Israel's covenant hope, not yet the "new creation" Paul later describes in 2 Corinthians 5:17. The rejection, however, sets the stage for salvation to be sent to the Gentiles through Paul's distinct apostleship ( Rom. 11:11-12).
In John 1:29, John identifies Jesus as "the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world." Israel expected a sacrificial Lamb to cover their sins ( Isa. 53), but the Spirit expands John's words to point beyond Israel. The phrase "of the world" foreshadows the universal reconciliation later made known through Paul: "God was in Christ, reconciling the world unto himself, not imputing their trespasses" ( 2 Cor. 5:19).
Dispensationally, John introduces the Messiah to Israel as their long-promised King, while unknowingly echoing truths that would later be fully revealed through Paul-the gospel of grace, Jew and Gentile made one body, and salvation offered freely apart from law.
This verse comes from the Jerusalem Council, where the apostles and elders gathered to settle the question: Must Gentile believers be circumcised and keep the law of Moses to be saved? Peter speaks here, affirming that salvation is by grace, not law.
Dispensational Understanding
From a dispensational viewpoint, Acts 15 sits at a transitional point in God's dealings with mankind:
Kingdom Program (Israel): Peter and the Twelve were originally preaching the Gospel of the Kingdom to Israel ( Matt. 10:5-7; Acts 3:19-21). Salvation was bound up with Israel's national repentance, the coming kingdom, and covenant promises.
Grace Program (Body of Christ): Paul, however, was given the "gospel of the uncircumcision" ( Gal. 2:7) - the message that Jew and Gentile alike are saved by grace through faith in Christ's finished cross-work, apart from the Law ( 1 Cor. 15:1-4; Eph. 2:8-9).
In Acts 15:11, Peter acknowledges Paul's gospel of grace. He essentially says: We (Jews) will be saved the same way as they (Gentiles) - through grace alone, not the Law. That's a remarkable reversal, because under the kingdom program Gentiles were blessed through Israel's rise. Now Peter admits Israel must come on the same basis as Gentiles: faith in Christ's grace without works.
Key Dispensational Insight
This verse highlights the shift from Israel's covenantal system under law toward Paul's revelation of grace.
It doesn't mean the kingdom program had fully ended yet (since the apostles still held to many Jewish practices in Acts), but it confirms Paul's message had authority and that grace through faith is the only way of salvation in this present dispensation.
You are correct on there being apostles and prophets.
Paul, in Ephesians 3, unfolds the "mystery" given to him as the steward of the dispensation of the grace of God. This mystery-Jew and Gentile made one body in Christ, apart from Israel's covenants and law-was "hid in God" from ages past (v. 9). It was not revealed to the prophets of the Old Testament, who only spoke of Israel's kingdom and earthly promises. Instead, Paul says it is now revealed "unto his holy apostles and prophets by the Spirit" (v. 5). From a dispensational view, the "apostles" here are New Testament apostles, Paul himself foremost as the apostle of the Gentiles ( Rom. 11:13; Gal. 2:7-9). The others-Peter, John, and the rest-learned of this mystery through Paul's revelation ( Gal. 2:2, 9), though their ministry remained primarily to Israel.
The "prophets" mentioned are also not Old Testament prophets, but New Testament prophets who functioned in the early church ( 1 Cor. 12:28; Eph. 4:11). These Spirit-gifted men confirmed Paul's revelation in the churches during the transition period before the written Word was complete. Thus, Paul speaks inclusively: what was uniquely revealed to him (v. 2-3) became known among other apostles and prophets as the Spirit bore witness.
This keeps the distinction clear: the mystery was not foretold in Israel's prophetic program, nor found in the law, prophets, or gospels. It was hidden until God chose to reveal it through Paul, then made known in the present dispensation. Ephesians 2:20 ties these apostles and prophets to the foundation of the Body of Christ, with Jesus Christ Himself as the chief cornerstone. The wall between Jew and Gentile has been broken down ( Eph. 2:14-16).
In sum, from a dispensational standpoint: Paul is the divinely chosen steward; the other apostles and prophets were fellow recipients once the revelation was given; and the mystery program stands wholly distinct from Israel's
James does not teach that good works are necessary in order to gain salvation and Paul never teaches that good works are unnecessary after a person is saved. On the contrary, Paul agreed with James that for the person justified by faith, good works are essential ( Phil. 2:12-13; Titus 3:5-8; Eph. 2:8-10). Likewise, James agreed with Paul that the only condition for inheriting the kingdom was faith and faith alone (see James 2:5 and also Acts 15 where at the Jerusalem Council James never expressed disagreement over Paul's teaching that salvation was by faith and not by the works of the law).
So, there truly is no contradiction between James and Paul. It is only that they are addressing different problems among believers.
I believe I do see what Lbooth1955 is trying to display.
If I'm not mistaking he's saying Israel in response to the future Kingdom Gospel a response of works is required to show the fruit of the Spirit of Christ as their conversion.
Their means of salvation will point back at the work of Christ on the Cross.
If their salvation required works and not faith they wouldn't have been broken off.
Israel works performed in the old testament exhibited belief in a future Kingdom but the death of Christ and fellow heirs with the Gentiles wasn't revealed to them even though it was preached.
They couldn't recieve it perhaps because the indwelling of the Spirit hadn't taken place yet.
Romans 11:20 states that Israel was broken off because of unbelief.
Their unbelief is due to blindness and if they weren't blinded salvation would have come under the Levitical priesthood which couldn't save.
There would be no cross.
There would be no ressurection.
There would be no baptism of any sort!
There would also be no grafting in of the Gentiles!
I agree with you that James is teaching that true faith/conversion is accompanied by good works that are wrought in us by the Holy Spirit. In James, he is warning against antinomianism, where believers would not seek godly living, especially in having compassion and showing mercy to those in need by supplying for their actual need with physical assistance. He is identifying "faith" that does not produce godly works is "dead" (of no salvific use) but faith that produces a lifestyle that grows in godliness and desire to become more and more conformed to the holy life of Christ is faith that has justified the sinner because it shows that the sinner has been born again and reoriented towards God's ways desiring to live in obedience to the working of the Holy Spirit within this person.
I think that Paul in Rom. 3:28 was teaching against the legalism of the Judaizers who said that one must obey the Mosaic Law to be justified. Paul is adamant in stating that it is by faith without trying to have our efforts to keep the Law as a means of justifying ourselves. He consistently teaches that salvation is apart from the Law and is by grace (a gift) from God who enables one to believe the Gospel and place ones trust in Jesus and His work, which alone justifies anyone brought to God through Christ.
There are other places in Paul's writing where He emphasizes living a godly life as a result of faith as James teaches.
Both writers mention "works." Paul teaches that works are unnecessary but James teaches that works are essential. This apparent contradiction is solved when we realize that Paul was speaking of those good works that an unsaved person tries to do in order to win God's favor or work his way to heaven. James on the other hand was referring to those good works that a saved person performs which gives evidence of a real, living, saving faith.
Audience: Israel, under the covenants and promises.
Message: The long-promised kingdom, with Messiah reigning on David's throne, was "at hand."
Matthew 4:23 - "And Jesus went about preaching the gospel of the kingdom"
Matthew 10:5-7 - The Twelve were sent only to "the lost sheep of the house of Israel" with this gospel.
Luke 22:29-30 - The apostles are promised to sit on twelve thrones judging Israel in that kingdom.
Acts 3:19-21 - Peter still offers the kingdom if Israel repents, showing this program was continuing post-cross.
This gospel was prophetic, rooted in promises made "since the world began" ( Luke 1:70; Acts 3:21).
2. The Gospel of the Grace of God (Paul's Gospel)
Audience: Jew and Gentile alike, apart from Israel's covenants.
Message: Christ's death, burial, and resurrection for sins, offering free justification by faith.
Acts 20:24 - Paul calls it "the gospel of the grace of God."
Romans 16:25 - This gospel was "according to the revelation of the mystery, which was kept secret since the world began."
1 Corinthians 15:1-4 - The content: Christ died for our sins, was buried, and rose again.
Galatians 1:11-12 - Paul received it by direct revelation from Christ, not from the Twelve.
This gospel creates the Body of Christ ( 1 Cor. 12:13; Eph. 3:6), uniting Jew and Gentile in one new man.
3. Jews Responding to Both Programs
Some Jews believed Peter and the Eleven's message of the kingdom ( Acts 2:41; Acts 4:4). James writes to these scattered tribes ( James 1:1), exhorting them in kingdom-related works and endurance.
Other Jews believed Paul's gospel of grace and became part of the Body ( Rom. 11:13-14; 1 Cor. 9:20-22).
4. Dispensational Distinction
Kingdom Gospel = Israel's prophetic hope on earth.
Grace Gospel = Body of Christ's heavenly hope, revealed through Paul.
Both have Christ as center, but their scope and promises differ.
Thanks for the clarification Lbooth1955 that James is writing to the dispersed believing Jews, but sadly, I still need a further clarification. You stated that "the audience (in James 1:1) is unmistakably Israel"; that "James was writing to the twelve tribes, not the Body of Christ..and these were believing Jews..".
This leaves me confused, so the question, 'how can these be believing Jews and not also be a very real part of the Body of Christ'? By believing, I understand that they have, like us, recognized their sin, their need of a Savior, and have looked only to Him for their salvation and not to their works, whether in the Law, their acts towards God, or by election. Or maybe, you have a different view of these Jews. So, if you could clarify this point for me: can Jews who have put their faith in Jesus not be considered as members of equal standing to Gentiles in the Body of Christ? I'm not referring to Messianic Jews, as we have now, whose beliefs can be held in question, but to those who have come to faith as we have & left all for Christ. Blessings.
I too believe that the Gospel of the kingdom is distinct from the Gospel to the Church.
However, I never studied it in depth.
In fact I never considered James 1:1 through James 2:1 as you mentioned it.
This reminds me of Deuteronomy 18:15-19
"The LORD thy God will raise up unto thee a Prophet from the midst of thee, of thy brethren, like unto me; unto him ye shall hearken;
According to all that thou desiredst of the LORD thy God in Horeb in the day of the assembly, saying, Let me not hear again the voice of the LORD my God, neither let me see this great fire any more, that I die not.
And the LORD said unto me, They have well spoken that which they have spoken.
I will raise them up a Prophet from among their brethren, like unto thee, and will put my words in his mouth; and he shall speak unto them all that I shall command him.
And it shall come to pass, that whosoever will not hearken unto my words which he shall speak in my name, I will require it of him
This may be a kingdom prophecy!
This haven't happened yet to the point where Israel as a nation hearkens to the words of the Lord.
I've always viewed this as a prophecy for the Church.
I believe it's atleast provocative and worthy of a in depth study.
I have thought this prophecy was to be fulfilled in Jesus at His incarnation. I notice that at His transfiguration the Father told the disciples to hear Jesus (listen to him or harken to what He is saying) Mt. 17:5.
But it may also have a future fulfillment as well with the incoming of those of Israel into the church.
I know that Jesus did give commandments to His followers and told them to disciple and teach those they baptize all that He commanded them. And I think that this commission was for the church especially, and not for the nation of Israel for it is in the church that Christ promised to build that believers are baptized into Christ Jesus.
That could be true however there is a unique difference in the way Christ is presented to Lordship over the Church and Lordship in the Kingdom here on earth.
Christ Lordship is over our hearts without any written articles on tablets.
In the Kingdom Christ is ruling with a rod of iron.
In Revelation 12:5 we see the Israel presented as the woman and her children who shall rule the nations with a rod of iron. Christ.
The Church is never identified as the nations or inhabitants of the earth.
Deuteronomy 18:18-19 seems to fit Christ ruling here on earth with a rod of iron as presented in other scriptures and that is a fulfillment of the Davidic covenant.
"I will raise them up a Prophet from among their brethren, like unto thee, and will put my words in his mouth; and he shall speak unto them all that I shall command him.
And it shall come to pass, that whosoever will not hearken unto my words which he shall speak in my name, I will require it of him."
Other passages;
Revelation 2:27.
Revelation 19:15.
Isaiah 65:16-25 has much to say about this economy.
This echoes Psalms 2:6-9.
"Yet have I set my king upon my holy hill of Zion.
I will declare the decree: the LORD hath said unto me, Thou art my Son; this day have I begotten thee.
Ask of me, and I shall give thee the heathen for thine inheritance, and the uttermost parts of the earth for thy possession.
Thou shalt break them with a rod of iron; thou shalt dash them in pieces like a potter's vessel.
Scripture says the Church shall reign with Christ.
Revelation 20:6.
2 Timothy 2:12.
Revelation 5:10.
Luke 22:28-30.
The reigning is not a present reality but a future hope for believers.
I agree fir are not " All scripture is given by inspiration of God and is good for correction reproof and instruction in righteousness able to furnish the man of God." Does not that " ALL " mean all ?! Then James 1:1 applies also to me and to all .
The Old Testament is for me for all of it is profitable to study and think about.
The book revelation is for me as well as those churches mentioned indeed The last book can't realy be understood as it shouid be without a good understanding of the first book . For all that was sown in that book has its fruit in the last and the foundations of faith can be found in it also and give confidence to look ahead into the last book .
Indeed Gerald, all of Scripture is useful to us ALL and must be carefully considered in our daily Christian walk in Christ. Some of it is purely historical, others, applicable to those people referred to, and yet the major portion for our learning of God's Holy requirements for His children. And in it all, we need spiritual discernment in our reading and understanding of God's Word, or else we begin go astray, having to twist and turn the Word in whatever way we can to make it fit what we want to believe.
One particularly good example of gross misuse of Scripture was when a particular Christian (closed) group, which I won't mention by name here, gave teaching on young David's preparation as he made his move towards Goliath. 1 Samuel 17:40 tells us that he chose five smooth stones from the brook and put them in his shepherd's bag. A normal reading of this verse/passage, tells us that David was determined, full of courage, and prepared both in faith & practical ways to contend against Israel's enemy, the Philistine champion. But this Christian group I refer to are not content with such a simple teaching, but have gone to great lengths to show that those five stones revealed David's character and standing before God in this matter. So, each stone represents David's faith, courage, obedience, trust, and praise. How on earth can anyone derive such an understanding of five random stones from the brook? I can understand that all those five traits of David are valid, but to find & associate them in stones? And only one stone was slung out by David; which one of those five traits could have sunk into Goliath's forehead? So, I just share such an example, where some seem to have nothing 'new' or worthwhile to share with others, so just have to introduce bizarre meaningless drivel. Indeed, we need to be very careful in the reading of God's Word & how we teach it to others. GBU.
Deuteronomy 4:2: "You shall not add to the word that I am commanding you, nor take away from it, so that you may keep the commandments of the LORD your God that I am giving you."
Proverbs 30:5-6: "Every word of God is flawless; He is a shield to those who take refuge in Him. Do not add to His words, or he will rebuke you and prove you a liar."
Revelation 22:18-19: "I warn everyone who hears the words of the prophecy of this scroll: If anyone adds anything to them, God will add to that person the plagues described in this scroll."
These verses serve as a safeguard against human interference that could distort divine truth. They underscore the importance of preserving the integrity of God's Word and the consequences of tampering with its messages.
I do not see anywhere in James that 2:24 is ONLY for the Israel. Although the letter is addresses to the Israelites scattered across the nations from the 10 tribes exiled to Assyria and then mingled among the Gentiles, 2 Tim. 3:16 tells believers under Timothy's shepherding that ALL SCRIPTURE is for all the church for various aspects of learning, conduct, and sanctification.
So, I can see that you overlay Scripture with your interpretation that some NT Scripture is for ethnic Israel only and other Scripture is for Gentiles and/or the church, which is somewhat of the lynchpin of dispensational hermeneutics, therefore you are bringing this outside bias/approach to the Scriptures. I would say that each of us may have bible interpretation approaches that differ from another believers' approach, and we should respect that we each can have differences in hermeneutics.
I do not overlay Scripture with the dispensational bias that you do which keeps Israel and the church/Gentile believers distinct in reference understanding Scripture. I think that Scripture is God inspired and transcends to all generations following the first generation of believers down to our own time because of what Paul exhorted Timothy in 2 Tim. 3:16 as well as what is written in Heb. 4:12.
I do agree that we are to be conscious for whom the bible passage is addressed to (usually in the opening statements in each book). But I do not think that we are to view any Scripture as being not for us and for our edification, learning, training in godliness, and for doctrine.
So, as to Paul in Rom. 3:28 and James 2:24, I take both Scriptures as being something I should believe is for me and that the Holy Spirit will lead believers to understand the apparent contradiction in these two verses. And therefore, I will explore the discrepancy between what Paul and James teach here more fully, as we always should do when we come upon two bible teachings that seem to disagree with each other.
From a dispensational perspective, the tension between James 2:24 ("by works a man is justified, and not by faith only") and Paul's clear statement in Romans 3:28 ("a man is justified by faith without the deeds of the law") is resolved by recognizing the distinct audiences and purposes of their writings. James 1:1 explicitly addresses "the twelve tribes which are scattered abroad"-Israel in dispersion. His emphasis on works demonstrating faith fits Israel's prophetic and kingdom program, where faith had to be validated by works (cf. Matt. 24:13; Acts 3:19-21). James is not laying out the gospel of grace as revealed to Paul, but reinforcing Israel's covenant responsibility of faith proven by deeds.
Paul, by contrast, reveals the "mystery" gospel ( Rom. 16:25; Eph. 3:1-9), hidden until given to him, where justification is by faith alone in Christ's finished work ( 1 Cor. 15:1-4). This is not "overlaying bias," but taking Scripture in its own stated context. All Scripture is indeed inspired and profitable ( 2 Tim. 3:16), but "profitable" does not mean all Scripture is written to us. For example, Leviticus laws or temple sacrifices are not binding today, yet they instruct us about God's holiness. In the same way, James is for our learning, but Paul's epistles are uniquely to the Body of Christ concerning salvation and justification in this dispensation.
Dispensationalism does not diminish the whole Bible; it respects God's progressive revelation. To blend James and Paul as if both are directly prescribing doctrine for the Church today obscures the very clarity Paul magnifies: salvation apart from works. The Spirit does not leave us with contradiction-He calls us to "rightly divide the word of truth" ( 2 Tim. 2:15).
While I do not adhere to the overlaying bias of dispensational doctrine upon Scripture as you indeed do, I appreciate your thoughts on how you interpret Scripture.
I am still working on understanding James 2:24 and Rom. 3:28. I do not agree that James' teaching is for ethnic Israel and Paul's is for Gentile believers. I do not hold to the hermeneutic of keeping Israel and the Church distinct because I do not see this taught in Scripture.
But I do take into account how the epistles identify it's immediate audience, yet we do know that these epistles and the gospels where circulated among the churches, whether in Judea or around the Mediterranean lands, and so this reveals that ALL of the NT Scriptures were intended by the Holy Spirit to be for the whole of the church of that time and also down through the centuries to us to include Jews, Israelites of the 10 tribes, and Gentiles who are believers in Jesus and members of His church forever. I do not see that there is Scripture addressed to unbelieving Israel in these NT writings.
Food for thought about context!
Context is the anchor that keeps Bible study from drifting into speculation. Every verse has a setting: who wrote it, to whom it was written, what was happening historically, and what came before and after. Pulling a single phrase without its frame can lead to contradictions or even false doctrines. For example, James 2:24 says a man is justified by works, while Romans 3:28 declares justification by faith without works. At first glance, these clash-but context shows James is addressing Israel's faith under law, while Paul is revealing justification in Christ apart from law in this dispensation.
Interpreting scripture with scripture means letting the Bible explain itself. God's Word is a unified whole, and comparing passages sheds light on difficult texts. Paul himself appealed to the Old Testament to confirm truths ( Romans 4 using Abraham as an example). This method guards against personal bias by ensuring one verse is not isolated, but harmonized with the rest of God's revelation.
Without context and cross-referencing, readers may force their own meaning into the text. But with them, clarity emerges, and God's progressive revelation becomes plain: Israel's promises remain, while the Body of Christ has its distinct calling. In short, context and comparing scripture with scripture protects truth, sharpens understanding, and preserves God's intended message.
Grace and Peace.
Works are equal to fasting for the salvation of people, we have works that promote the kingdom of God. We have works that look good. We have works that clearly show that we are of a Heavenly people. All of these are works. We have works that we must do and works that are for the Lord Jesus. He also did works. Healings and expulsions, and mm. And many served Him, the actions that were done are works. (Should we sit and twiddle our thumbs or just lie on our backs and do nothing. Now Spiritually we have many works we CAN do for the Lord. Pray is one of them remember Eph 6:12 We do not do it in a work of law. But in the freedom that Jesus Christ has set for us).
Paul is the Apostle of the Gentiles, but you see how many Jews have been saved by Paul's words afterwards! The word is free for all. There is no difference here. He writes so that people understand. Remember that in the covenant and the law there was no law with deviation. The freedom everyone has received through the new covenant. Must be difficult to understand for those who have lived for generations with laws they cannot keep. Of course the people of Israel had to do as best they could! No one could have done this diffrently.
When we come to the Spiritual, there are people who do not lift a finger unless they are seized by the spirit. That is good and completely right. If they do! Personally, I think that many have great confusion about this. Because doing the right thing for the Lord can be and not go in itself. But go for the Lord. Paul says that we must test everything, including the spirit. I think we must be patient and wait on the Lord. In the time that He has determined, He reveals things to us. Until then, we must wait, and wait, and wait even longer. Or do something so that we get attention. It is a choice every day. We can ask ourselves whether we are following the Lord or leading the Lord. But enough from me. Go on, love you all
Thanks for your comments, and you are always welcome to commit.
Grace and Peace.
All sound doctrine can be likened unto the bones of the body . Each having its function and each in its right pisition and relationship with the others .
Taking one doctrine the dispensations of God for instance cannot be denied for they are clearly taught . But you change the truth into a lie when you try to read all the scriptures by that one doctrine . For not all Scripture will or can fit into it and sooner or later you will have to " twist the scriptures" to make them fit .
Predestination is another in truth every " ISM " can be proven to be wrong yet founded upon a truth taken out of shape and context of "all scripture ".
False and heretical doctrines are usually founded upon one at most two verses and a mountain of error is built upon them that ignore and deny so many other scruptures that prove them wrong .
The Roman church is sadly a master at such convoluted reasoning .
The obvious one upon which the edifice of its own making is that Peter was the rock upon which the church is built but ignores and denies all the scriptures that prove that " God is the Rock" .
And you cannot build an eternal church on a son of Adam but you can build a church on "The only begotten Son of God".
He made the mistake of tninking the light that he had and was given of heaven was all the light . And when the Lord began to give more light denied it and began to instruct the Lord . To the extent that the Lord rebuked him severely " get behind me Satan" the man that had at one moment spoken words of heaven with the next breath became a spokesman of hell and the devil . God in his love and wisdom laid out all of Peters weaknesses and failings in every sphere for our sakes .
Not many would have stayed after such an open rebuke (.Justas did not . )
Peter even acknowledging that the doctrines of Paul were not always "easy to understand "
Etc etc .
Even more tragically Rome has added to her false doctrines and now claims she is infallible in them
To what purpose ? " Till we all come to a unity of THE faith " if faith comes by understanding the Word of God then as he said that we might all "think the same thing " have the same mind " what mind ? If not that of the " Holy Sprit who knoweth the mind of God"L
For are not words expression of thought? If then Gods thought are higher than our thoughts the Holy Spirit is needed as much to understand what was inspired to be written .
The art of biblical argument has sadly it seems declined and been with tick box doctrine statements like TULIP .
I have read but little of Calvin but enough to see and understand his use of z biblical argument as did many other Reformers .
But many have simply jumped to conclusions about what they think he said rather than follow his arguments and indeed more importantly Paul's .
But if you jump to conclusions you rarely if ever arrive at the truth .
Shepherds in England drive the sheep with dogs . In the middk east the shepherd leads them and they follow .
When the Holy Spurit comes the Spurit of truth "He will lead us into all truth"
Given so many 'versions' of the Bible all saying different from each other omitting and adding to the scriptures and an awful bad habit of subjecting the scriptures to nans intellect rather than the other way round the church is riddled with confusion and is much skin Tom" all we ,Ike sheep have gone astray.." The Holy Spirit of Truth is o in the meantime "outside knocking on the door ". Rev 3
And while many boast in revivals and thec" anointing" there is very little evidence for both for the eternal resting p,ace of the Holy Spirit is the Word of God . The living Word even that which was in the beginning .
For if a man cannot be heard or understood unless he gives his breath or life to those words how much the more the Word of God that comes forth from His mouth?
Others boast in their 'better understanding ' but by their works / versions prove they have very little .
You've made some allegations that I find unfounded considering that I have been diligent to include scripture supporting my beliefs. You on the other hand have not done so.
So, I"ll try to clear the air regarding your concern. From what you've shared, it seems you believe I am not relying on sound doctrine and that I am making the claim that only Paul's doctrine applies to us today.(Regarding Paul this is true). However my intention is not to dismiss the rest of Scripture, but rather to highlight Paul's unique role as the apostle to the Gentiles. Sound doctrine requires us to recognize distinctions in Scripture, and part of that includes understanding that Paul was given specific revelation for the Body of Christ in this present dispensation.
I hold firmly that all of Scripture is God-breathed, profitable for learning, and necessary for understanding God's full plan. However, when it comes to our instructions for daily living and the gospel of salvation in this age of grace, Paul's writings carry special weight because they were directly entrusted to him for the Church (can you really deny this?). This is not a rejection of the law, prophets, or the twelve apostles, but an acknowledgment of the stewardship of the "mystery" revealed to Paul ( Ephesians 3:2-9). Ignoring this distinct calling blurs the lines between God's promises to Israel and His present work in the Body of Christ.
Sound doctrine, therefore, means using Scripture rightly divided. We can honor the whole Bible without mixing programs that God Himself keeps distinct. My emphasis on Paul's doctrine is not narrowness, but fidelity to what was committed to him "for us." If this has come across as exclusionary, that was not my intent-it's about clarity, not division. I hope this helps explain why I stress Paul's role without denying the value of all the Word.
Peace and Grace.
One swallow does not make a summer so also one verse does not prove a doctrine . Many a religious has built a mountain of heretical doctrine upon one verse . A doctrine is proved by " all scripture " using all scripture to examine the one verse and reconcile it. Not using one verse to try and fit all scripture to that one doctrine .
For " should doctrine " are like the bones of the body . Each in their place and each with its function working together .
Having said all that we must also recognise the Biblical argument . Which using verses in their right context and to uphold an 'argument' as and when they apply . There is really no such thing as a 'proof text' so often used but unable to prove anything all on its own . Though it can be used to challenge an assertion that cannot be upheld by scripture . ' Man has the right to life' for instance a Godless and vain assertion that denies the very simple truth that a " man's life is in his nostrils" .But just quoting texts at each other neither gives understanding in the one you perceive has none or little on a subject .
The finest examples of Biblical argument are those given by Paul principally in his letters to the Romans and the Hebrews.
There you will find an argument much like a legal one in an appeal courts ruling.
Where he seeks us to follow his argument . To what end ? That if we follow his argument and understandably agree we will arrive at the same conclusions. It's like climbing a mountain where you start ' seeing' little but as you climb every so often you stop to take a breather. And look back to see where you have come so far and Paul uses those breaks and says " therefore" in the light of all that's been said so far " count yourself dead to sin." For instance
He uses it often . But we find every so often and when needed to bolster his argument he will use a verse of scripture as anchors to our thinking .
So when we come to James 1:1, we should correctly believe that James is addressing Israel's twelve tribes scattered into other lands. But when we read James 2:1, he gives us insight as to who these people actually are: "My brethren, have not the faith of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Lord of glory, with respect of persons." Yes, they are his kinsmen by blood, but also joined to them by faith in Christ. It seems, even as Apostle Paul also writes in his epistles, that their heart-strings are still very much attached to and in great concern for their people, but that is only in reference to those of Jewry who are believers, one with them in faith and Spirit. Given all this, would you still maintain that James was written to the unbelieving scattered tribes of Israel?
Regarding James, I must have misspoken or maybe not clear on my standing.
I'll try to give some clarity here.
James 1:1 declares, "James, a servant of God and of the Lord Jesus Christ, to the twelve tribes which are scattered abroad, greeting." The audience is unmistakably Israel. James is writing to the twelve tribes, not the Body of Christ. These were believing Jews dispersed outside their land. Dispensationally, this aligns with God's prophetic and kingdom program, not the mystery revealed to Paul. The letter prepares the scattered remnant for endurance under trial (1:2), looking toward tribulation and kingdom promises. The timing is before Paul's mystery truth became central, fitting the framework of Israel's ongoing kingdom offer.
James 2:1 continues, "My brethren, have not the faith of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Lord of glory, with respect of persons." The "brethren" are the same Jewish believers, Israel's faithful remnant. The teaching flows from kingdom law, echoing Christ's Sermon on the Mount: impartiality, humility, and mercy. Their faith is kingdom faith in Messiah as Lord of glory, awaiting His earthly reign. This is not Paul's justification by faith apart from works ( Romans 3-5). Rather, James stresses faith validated by works (2:14-26), a hallmark of the kingdom program. Genuine allegiance to Messiah must show itself outwardly as proof during testing.
In comparison, James 1:1 defines the scope: the audience is Israel's twelve tribes. James 2:1 exhorts them in their kingdom walk. Both confirm James is not doctrinally written to the Gentile Body of Christ but to Israel under prophecy. Paul's letters, not James, unfold the gospel of grace and truth of the Body in this dispensation.
Grace and Peace.
Correct me if I'm wrong.
From what I have gathered is there are two Gospels being preached. (By the way I agree with that.)
1) The Gospel of the kingdom.
2) The Gospel of the gathering of the Church.
There are Jews who responded to each Gospel with Christ being the center of each Gospel.
There are Jews who responded to the preaching of Paul's Gospel who makes up the Body of the Church. (Jews and Gentiles)
There's also those "Jews and perhaps remnant" who responded to the other eleven Gospel "The Gospel of the Kingdom.
These are who James is addressing.
Thanks in advance.
If you want some in depth Bible study on dispensationalism and have time to sit down and watch teachings generally ranging from 45 minutes to an hours long look up Grace ambassadors on YouTube. He has some wonderful teachings there.
Grace and Peace
Galatians 2:7-9 - Clear distinction: "the gospel of the circumcision" committed to Peter, "the gospel of the uncircumcision" committed to Paul.
In summary: James addresses believing Jews within the kingdom program, while Paul's epistles reveal the mystery program forming the Church, the Body of Christ. Two gospels, not contradictory, but distinct according to God's dispensational plan.
Grace and Peace
Thanks for responding.
I believe I understood you correctly other than you calling me Chris.
However your replies came to my inbox so I'm sure I'm the recipient.
I agree on much you have said but I believe Paul in ( Eph. 3:1-9) includes all the Apostles in the knowledge of the mystery of Christ as seen in verse 5
"Which in other ages was not made known unto the sons of men, as it is now revealed unto HIS HOLY APOSTLES and prophets by the Spirit;
Also in Acts 15:7-11 at the counsel in Jerusalem Peter makes that clear.
In verse 11 Peter says something that suggests that stands out to me concerning future salvation requirements preached by the 11 for their audiences. (Jews)
Vs 11. "But we believe that through the grace of the Lord Jesus Christ we shall be saved, even as they."
I believe what Peter is saying in the same way the gentiles is saved. We shall be saved in that same manner. faith.
The mystery is that God's plan of salvation now includes Gentiles as well as Jews, uniting them into one body, the Church. Yes I believe that is Paul's primary message to disperse but I believe that mystery was eventually revealed to all the Apostles.
John the baptist also introduced Christ to Israel in a way that he brings forth Christ as this mystery unfolding in John 1:7-9. also in John 1:11-13 and John 1:29.
On to James.
In James I believe he's saying faith is being exhibited by works as proof.
I don't believe he's saying works is required to be contributed to salvation.
That is what's meant in James 2:18.
"I will shew thee my faith by my works"
Blessings.
Both believing Jews under the prophetic program and members of the Body of Christ responded in faith to God's Word, yet the identity, destiny, and message of these groups were distinct. The Jews to whom James wrote ( Jas. 1:1; 2:1) were part of Israel's covenantal framework. Their hope was tied to promises made to the fathers and the establishment of a kingdom on earth under Messiah's reign ( Acts 3:19-21). Their identity was rooted in the twelve tribes, and their faith was demonstrated by obedience-works that showed living faith, preparing them for Israel's national restoration ( Jas. 2:21-24).
The Body of Christ, revealed uniquely through Paul, has a different identity altogether. Composed of Jew and Gentile made one new man ( Eph. 2:14-16), this Body is not bound to Israel's covenants but to the revelation of the mystery ( Eph. 3:1-9). Their destiny is heavenly, with blessings "in heavenly places in Christ" ( Eph. 1:3), and their message centers on the gospel of grace-salvation apart from works, by faith alone in Christ's finished work ( Rom. 3:28; Eph. 2:8-9).
Thus, while both groups believed God and received His Word, the dispensational distinction safeguards the clarity of Scripture. Israel looks for a restored kingdom on earth under Christ the King; the Body of Christ looks to a heavenly calling under Christ the Head. The same Lord, but different programs, promises, and purposes.
Grace and Peace
I believe we are closer than what you think!
As you can probably tell, I am a dispensationalists all so.
I haven't studied much on the kingdom Gospel but I am very aware of it and it's distinction from the mystery later presented by the Apostles, Primary Paul.
Your presentation rung bells.
It's obvious there were OT saints saved under Israel's covenantal framework, where faith was "DEMONSTRATED" by obedience to God's commands.
They were persuaded by the Spirit of Christ and demonstrated it by their works.
1 Peter 1-13 declares the Gospel of grace was preached to the OT prophets with Christ as the author and finish work of their faith.
Verses 9-13 most noticeable.
Receiving the end of your faith, even the salvation of your souls.
Of which salvation the prophets have enquired and searched diligently, who prophesied of the grace that should come unto you:
Searching what, or what manner of time THE SPIRIT OF CHRIST WHICH WAS IN THEM did signify, when it testified beforehand the sufferings of Christ, and the glory that should follow.
Unto whom it was revealed, that not unto themselves, but unto us they did minister the things, which are now reported unto you by them that have preached the gospel unto you with the Holy Ghost sent down from heaven; which things the angels desire to look into.
Wherefore gird up the loins of your mind, be sober, and hope to the end for the grace that is to be brought unto you at the revelation of Jesus Christ;
The Gospel was preached!
What was left out is the mystery "that the Gentiles should be fellowheirs, and of the same body, and partakers of his promise in Christ by the gospel:
The old testament saints was saved looking forward to the grace that shall come in their Messiah and they demonstrated that by their works in their covenantal framework.
Blessings.
Well spoken, and yes I noticed that you were likely to be a dispensationalist.
I appreciate and welcome your responses.
Grace and Peace.
Thank you and your fellowship is very welcome.
God bless you and all that you do.
James' readers were indeed believers, but the framework of their belief must be understood dispensationally. James 2:1 affirms they had "the faith of our Lord Jesus Christ," yet James 1:1 makes clear his epistle is written "to the twelve tribes which are scattered abroad." This indicates Jewish believers under Israel's prophetic program, not the Body of Christ formed through Paul's revelation of the mystery. Their faith was genuine, but it was linked to the promises given to Israel concerning the coming kingdom.
Dispensational truth shows two distinct ministries: Paul, entrusted with the "dispensation of the grace of God" ( Eph. 3:2), reveals the gospel of the uncircumcision-salvation by grace through faith alone, apart from works or covenant promises ( Rom. 3:28; Eph. 2:8-9). In this gospel, Jew and Gentile are united into one Body ( Eph. 2:14-16). James, however, operates within Israel's covenantal framework, where faith was demonstrated by obedience to God's commands, such as Abraham offering Isaac or Rahab receiving the spies ( Jas. 2:21-25). These "works" did not replace faith but evidenced a living faith expected of Israel as she prepared for her promised kingdom ( Acts 3:19-21).
Thus, James' audience were true believers but not members of the Body of Christ revealed through Paul. They were saved within Israel's prophetic program, awaiting the earthly kingdom. Paul's audience, by contrast, belongs to the Body, a heavenly people with a distinct calling. Dispensationalism preserves this distinction, avoiding confusion between the prophetic promises to Israel and the mystery program revealed to Paul. Both groups believed God's Word to them, yet their identity, destiny, and message were not the same.
James 2:18 declares: "Yea, a man may say, Thou hast faith, and I have works: shew me thy faith without thy works, and I will shew thee my faith by my works." James addresses "the twelve tribes scattered abroad" ( James 1:1), pointing directly to Israel in dispersion. His message continues Israel's covenant program, where faith must be evidenced by works as proof of loyalty to God's promises. This aligns with the prophetic requirement that obedience secured covenant blessing ( Deut. 28).
James stresses that a faith without works is "dead" ( James 2:17). His examples are Abraham, who demonstrated faith by offering Isaac ( James 2:21-23), and Rahab, who showed faith by sheltering the spies ( James 2:25). Both lived under Israel's program, where covenant faith was confirmed through outward deeds. This context differs from Paul's later revelation to the Body of Christ. Paul writes: "To him that worketh not, but believeth on him that justifieth the ungodly, his faith is counted for righteousness" ( Rom. 4:5). He too cites Abraham, but from Genesis 15:6-when he simply believed God before Isaac was offered.
Dispensationally, there is no contradiction. James applies Genesis 22, highlighting faith proven by action, consistent with Israel's prophetic expectation and even Christ's own teaching: "Let your light so shine before men" ( Matt. 5:16). Paul, however, reveals the "mystery" of justification apart from works ( Rom. 3:28; Eph. 2:8-9), given uniquely to the Body of Christ.
Thus James 2:18 fits Israel's covenant framework, while Paul's writings explain salvation under grace today. Both are true, but for different dispensational purposes.
we agree on much, but not all and that's ok.
Grace and Peace
John the Baptist's role is to present Christ to Israel within the framework of prophecy, yet his words carry foreshadows that later unfold in Paul's revelation of the mystery. In John 1:7-9, John comes to bear witness of the Light, pointing Israel to their promised Messiah. This ministry is clearly part of Israel's prophetic program ( Isa. 9:2; Mal. 3:1). Yet the phrase "that all men through him might believe" hints at a wider purpose, though not explained in that time. Gentile inclusion would remain unrevealed until Paul received the dispensation of grace ( Eph. 3:2-6).
In John 1:11-13, Christ "came unto his own, and his own received him not." Israel as a nation largely rejected Him, but a believing remnant received Him by faith and were given authority to become sons of God. This aligns with Israel's covenant hope, not yet the "new creation" Paul later describes in 2 Corinthians 5:17. The rejection, however, sets the stage for salvation to be sent to the Gentiles through Paul's distinct apostleship ( Rom. 11:11-12).
In John 1:29, John identifies Jesus as "the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world." Israel expected a sacrificial Lamb to cover their sins ( Isa. 53), but the Spirit expands John's words to point beyond Israel. The phrase "of the world" foreshadows the universal reconciliation later made known through Paul: "God was in Christ, reconciling the world unto himself, not imputing their trespasses" ( 2 Cor. 5:19).
Dispensationally, John introduces the Messiah to Israel as their long-promised King, while unknowingly echoing truths that would later be fully revealed through Paul-the gospel of grace, Jew and Gentile made one body, and salvation offered freely apart from law.
Context of Acts 15
I think we agree for the most part on this.
This verse comes from the Jerusalem Council, where the apostles and elders gathered to settle the question: Must Gentile believers be circumcised and keep the law of Moses to be saved? Peter speaks here, affirming that salvation is by grace, not law.
Dispensational Understanding
From a dispensational viewpoint, Acts 15 sits at a transitional point in God's dealings with mankind:
Kingdom Program (Israel): Peter and the Twelve were originally preaching the Gospel of the Kingdom to Israel ( Matt. 10:5-7; Acts 3:19-21). Salvation was bound up with Israel's national repentance, the coming kingdom, and covenant promises.
Grace Program (Body of Christ): Paul, however, was given the "gospel of the uncircumcision" ( Gal. 2:7) - the message that Jew and Gentile alike are saved by grace through faith in Christ's finished cross-work, apart from the Law ( 1 Cor. 15:1-4; Eph. 2:8-9).
In Acts 15:11, Peter acknowledges Paul's gospel of grace. He essentially says: We (Jews) will be saved the same way as they (Gentiles) - through grace alone, not the Law. That's a remarkable reversal, because under the kingdom program Gentiles were blessed through Israel's rise. Now Peter admits Israel must come on the same basis as Gentiles: faith in Christ's grace without works.
Key Dispensational Insight
This verse highlights the shift from Israel's covenantal system under law toward Paul's revelation of grace.
It doesn't mean the kingdom program had fully ended yet (since the apostles still held to many Jewish practices in Acts), but it confirms Paul's message had authority and that grace through faith is the only way of salvation in this present dispensation.
You are correct on there being apostles and prophets.
Paul, in Ephesians 3, unfolds the "mystery" given to him as the steward of the dispensation of the grace of God. This mystery-Jew and Gentile made one body in Christ, apart from Israel's covenants and law-was "hid in God" from ages past (v. 9). It was not revealed to the prophets of the Old Testament, who only spoke of Israel's kingdom and earthly promises. Instead, Paul says it is now revealed "unto his holy apostles and prophets by the Spirit" (v. 5). From a dispensational view, the "apostles" here are New Testament apostles, Paul himself foremost as the apostle of the Gentiles ( Rom. 11:13; Gal. 2:7-9). The others-Peter, John, and the rest-learned of this mystery through Paul's revelation ( Gal. 2:2, 9), though their ministry remained primarily to Israel.
The "prophets" mentioned are also not Old Testament prophets, but New Testament prophets who functioned in the early church ( 1 Cor. 12:28; Eph. 4:11). These Spirit-gifted men confirmed Paul's revelation in the churches during the transition period before the written Word was complete. Thus, Paul speaks inclusively: what was uniquely revealed to him (v. 2-3) became known among other apostles and prophets as the Spirit bore witness.
This keeps the distinction clear: the mystery was not foretold in Israel's prophetic program, nor found in the law, prophets, or gospels. It was hidden until God chose to reveal it through Paul, then made known in the present dispensation. Ephesians 2:20 ties these apostles and prophets to the foundation of the Body of Christ, with Jesus Christ Himself as the chief cornerstone. The wall between Jew and Gentile has been broken down ( Eph. 2:14-16).
In sum, from a dispensational standpoint: Paul is the divinely chosen steward; the other apostles and prophets were fellow recipients once the revelation was given; and the mystery program stands wholly distinct from Israel's
James does not teach that good works are necessary in order to gain salvation and Paul never teaches that good works are unnecessary after a person is saved. On the contrary, Paul agreed with James that for the person justified by faith, good works are essential ( Phil. 2:12-13; Titus 3:5-8; Eph. 2:8-10). Likewise, James agreed with Paul that the only condition for inheriting the kingdom was faith and faith alone (see James 2:5 and also Acts 15 where at the Jerusalem Council James never expressed disagreement over Paul's teaching that salvation was by faith and not by the works of the law).
So, there truly is no contradiction between James and Paul. It is only that they are addressing different problems among believers.
I believe I do see what Lbooth1955 is trying to display.
If I'm not mistaking he's saying Israel in response to the future Kingdom Gospel a response of works is required to show the fruit of the Spirit of Christ as their conversion.
Their means of salvation will point back at the work of Christ on the Cross.
If their salvation required works and not faith they wouldn't have been broken off.
Israel works performed in the old testament exhibited belief in a future Kingdom but the death of Christ and fellow heirs with the Gentiles wasn't revealed to them even though it was preached.
They couldn't recieve it perhaps because the indwelling of the Spirit hadn't taken place yet.
Romans 11:20 states that Israel was broken off because of unbelief.
Their unbelief is due to blindness and if they weren't blinded salvation would have come under the Levitical priesthood which couldn't save.
There would be no cross.
There would be no ressurection.
There would be no baptism of any sort!
There would also be no grafting in of the Gentiles!
There would be no first fruit.
There would be no salvation!
Blessings and Goodnight.
Blessins
I agree with you that James is teaching that true faith/conversion is accompanied by good works that are wrought in us by the Holy Spirit. In James, he is warning against antinomianism, where believers would not seek godly living, especially in having compassion and showing mercy to those in need by supplying for their actual need with physical assistance. He is identifying "faith" that does not produce godly works is "dead" (of no salvific use) but faith that produces a lifestyle that grows in godliness and desire to become more and more conformed to the holy life of Christ is faith that has justified the sinner because it shows that the sinner has been born again and reoriented towards God's ways desiring to live in obedience to the working of the Holy Spirit within this person.
I think that Paul in Rom. 3:28 was teaching against the legalism of the Judaizers who said that one must obey the Mosaic Law to be justified. Paul is adamant in stating that it is by faith without trying to have our efforts to keep the Law as a means of justifying ourselves. He consistently teaches that salvation is apart from the Law and is by grace (a gift) from God who enables one to believe the Gospel and place ones trust in Jesus and His work, which alone justifies anyone brought to God through Christ.
There are other places in Paul's writing where He emphasizes living a godly life as a result of faith as James teaches.
Both writers mention "works." Paul teaches that works are unnecessary but James teaches that works are essential. This apparent contradiction is solved when we realize that Paul was speaking of those good works that an unsaved person tries to do in order to win God's favor or work his way to heaven. James on the other hand was referring to those good works that a saved person performs which gives evidence of a real, living, saving faith.
See pt. 2
Here's a more detailed breakdown for you.
. The Gospel of the Kingdom
Audience: Israel, under the covenants and promises.
Message: The long-promised kingdom, with Messiah reigning on David's throne, was "at hand."
Matthew 4:23 - "And Jesus went about preaching the gospel of the kingdom"
Matthew 10:5-7 - The Twelve were sent only to "the lost sheep of the house of Israel" with this gospel.
Luke 22:29-30 - The apostles are promised to sit on twelve thrones judging Israel in that kingdom.
Acts 3:19-21 - Peter still offers the kingdom if Israel repents, showing this program was continuing post-cross.
This gospel was prophetic, rooted in promises made "since the world began" ( Luke 1:70; Acts 3:21).
2. The Gospel of the Grace of God (Paul's Gospel)
Audience: Jew and Gentile alike, apart from Israel's covenants.
Message: Christ's death, burial, and resurrection for sins, offering free justification by faith.
Acts 20:24 - Paul calls it "the gospel of the grace of God."
Romans 16:25 - This gospel was "according to the revelation of the mystery, which was kept secret since the world began."
1 Corinthians 15:1-4 - The content: Christ died for our sins, was buried, and rose again.
Galatians 1:11-12 - Paul received it by direct revelation from Christ, not from the Twelve.
This gospel creates the Body of Christ ( 1 Cor. 12:13; Eph. 3:6), uniting Jew and Gentile in one new man.
3. Jews Responding to Both Programs
Some Jews believed Peter and the Eleven's message of the kingdom ( Acts 2:41; Acts 4:4). James writes to these scattered tribes ( James 1:1), exhorting them in kingdom-related works and endurance.
Other Jews believed Paul's gospel of grace and became part of the Body ( Rom. 11:13-14; 1 Cor. 9:20-22).
4. Dispensational Distinction
Kingdom Gospel = Israel's prophetic hope on earth.
Grace Gospel = Body of Christ's heavenly hope, revealed through Paul.
Both have Christ as center, but their scope and promises differ.
see pg2
This leaves me confused, so the question, 'how can these be believing Jews and not also be a very real part of the Body of Christ'? By believing, I understand that they have, like us, recognized their sin, their need of a Savior, and have looked only to Him for their salvation and not to their works, whether in the Law, their acts towards God, or by election. Or maybe, you have a different view of these Jews. So, if you could clarify this point for me: can Jews who have put their faith in Jesus not be considered as members of equal standing to Gentiles in the Body of Christ? I'm not referring to Messianic Jews, as we have now, whose beliefs can be held in question, but to those who have come to faith as we have & left all for Christ. Blessings.
I too believe that the Gospel of the kingdom is distinct from the Gospel to the Church.
However, I never studied it in depth.
In fact I never considered James 1:1 through James 2:1 as you mentioned it.
This reminds me of Deuteronomy 18:15-19
"The LORD thy God will raise up unto thee a Prophet from the midst of thee, of thy brethren, like unto me; unto him ye shall hearken;
According to all that thou desiredst of the LORD thy God in Horeb in the day of the assembly, saying, Let me not hear again the voice of the LORD my God, neither let me see this great fire any more, that I die not.
And the LORD said unto me, They have well spoken that which they have spoken.
I will raise them up a Prophet from among their brethren, like unto thee, and will put my words in his mouth; and he shall speak unto them all that I shall command him.
And it shall come to pass, that whosoever will not hearken unto my words which he shall speak in my name, I will require it of him
This may be a kingdom prophecy!
This haven't happened yet to the point where Israel as a nation hearkens to the words of the Lord.
I've always viewed this as a prophecy for the Church.
I believe it's atleast provocative and worthy of a in depth study.
Blessings.
I have thought this prophecy was to be fulfilled in Jesus at His incarnation. I notice that at His transfiguration the Father told the disciples to hear Jesus (listen to him or harken to what He is saying) Mt. 17:5.
But it may also have a future fulfillment as well with the incoming of those of Israel into the church.
I know that Jesus did give commandments to His followers and told them to disciple and teach those they baptize all that He commanded them. And I think that this commission was for the church especially, and not for the nation of Israel for it is in the church that Christ promised to build that believers are baptized into Christ Jesus.
One other thing to note before I plunge into this busy work day.
If the Church was the only means for Israel to enter the kingdom then there would be no 12 tribes to rule over.
Just a thought.
Blessings
A good thought to consider.
I know that God knows absolutely every person who is of the 12 tribes so He will accomplish all of His purposes for everyone He calls and saves.
That could be true however there is a unique difference in the way Christ is presented to Lordship over the Church and Lordship in the Kingdom here on earth.
Christ Lordship is over our hearts without any written articles on tablets.
In the Kingdom Christ is ruling with a rod of iron.
In Revelation 12:5 we see the Israel presented as the woman and her children who shall rule the nations with a rod of iron. Christ.
The Church is never identified as the nations or inhabitants of the earth.
Deuteronomy 18:18-19 seems to fit Christ ruling here on earth with a rod of iron as presented in other scriptures and that is a fulfillment of the Davidic covenant.
"I will raise them up a Prophet from among their brethren, like unto thee, and will put my words in his mouth; and he shall speak unto them all that I shall command him.
And it shall come to pass, that whosoever will not hearken unto my words which he shall speak in my name, I will require it of him."
Other passages;
Revelation 2:27.
Revelation 19:15.
Isaiah 65:16-25 has much to say about this economy.
This echoes Psalms 2:6-9.
"Yet have I set my king upon my holy hill of Zion.
I will declare the decree: the LORD hath said unto me, Thou art my Son; this day have I begotten thee.
Ask of me, and I shall give thee the heathen for thine inheritance, and the uttermost parts of the earth for thy possession.
Thou shalt break them with a rod of iron; thou shalt dash them in pieces like a potter's vessel.
Scripture says the Church shall reign with Christ.
Revelation 20:6.
2 Timothy 2:12.
Revelation 5:10.
Luke 22:28-30.
The reigning is not a present reality but a future hope for believers.
Blessings.
The Old Testament is for me for all of it is profitable to study and think about.
The book revelation is for me as well as those churches mentioned indeed The last book can't realy be understood as it shouid be without a good understanding of the first book . For all that was sown in that book has its fruit in the last and the foundations of faith can be found in it also and give confidence to look ahead into the last book .
One particularly good example of gross misuse of Scripture was when a particular Christian (closed) group, which I won't mention by name here, gave teaching on young David's preparation as he made his move towards Goliath. 1 Samuel 17:40 tells us that he chose five smooth stones from the brook and put them in his shepherd's bag. A normal reading of this verse/passage, tells us that David was determined, full of courage, and prepared both in faith & practical ways to contend against Israel's enemy, the Philistine champion. But this Christian group I refer to are not content with such a simple teaching, but have gone to great lengths to show that those five stones revealed David's character and standing before God in this matter. So, each stone represents David's faith, courage, obedience, trust, and praise. How on earth can anyone derive such an understanding of five random stones from the brook? I can understand that all those five traits of David are valid, but to find & associate them in stones? And only one stone was slung out by David; which one of those five traits could have sunk into Goliath's forehead? So, I just share such an example, where some seem to have nothing 'new' or worthwhile to share with others, so just have to introduce bizarre meaningless drivel. Indeed, we need to be very careful in the reading of God's Word & how we teach it to others. GBU.
Proverbs 30:5-6: "Every word of God is flawless; He is a shield to those who take refuge in Him. Do not add to His words, or he will rebuke you and prove you a liar."
Revelation 22:18-19: "I warn everyone who hears the words of the prophecy of this scroll: If anyone adds anything to them, God will add to that person the plagues described in this scroll."
These verses serve as a safeguard against human interference that could distort divine truth. They underscore the importance of preserving the integrity of God's Word and the consequences of tampering with its messages.
I do not see anywhere in James that 2:24 is ONLY for the Israel. Although the letter is addresses to the Israelites scattered across the nations from the 10 tribes exiled to Assyria and then mingled among the Gentiles, 2 Tim. 3:16 tells believers under Timothy's shepherding that ALL SCRIPTURE is for all the church for various aspects of learning, conduct, and sanctification.
So, I can see that you overlay Scripture with your interpretation that some NT Scripture is for ethnic Israel only and other Scripture is for Gentiles and/or the church, which is somewhat of the lynchpin of dispensational hermeneutics, therefore you are bringing this outside bias/approach to the Scriptures. I would say that each of us may have bible interpretation approaches that differ from another believers' approach, and we should respect that we each can have differences in hermeneutics.
I do not overlay Scripture with the dispensational bias that you do which keeps Israel and the church/Gentile believers distinct in reference understanding Scripture. I think that Scripture is God inspired and transcends to all generations following the first generation of believers down to our own time because of what Paul exhorted Timothy in 2 Tim. 3:16 as well as what is written in Heb. 4:12.
I do agree that we are to be conscious for whom the bible passage is addressed to (usually in the opening statements in each book). But I do not think that we are to view any Scripture as being not for us and for our edification, learning, training in godliness, and for doctrine.
So, as to Paul in Rom. 3:28 and James 2:24, I take both Scriptures as being something I should believe is for me and that the Holy Spirit will lead believers to understand the apparent contradiction in these two verses. And therefore, I will explore the discrepancy between what Paul and James teach here more fully, as we always should do when we come upon two bible teachings that seem to disagree with each other.
From a dispensational perspective, the tension between James 2:24 ("by works a man is justified, and not by faith only") and Paul's clear statement in Romans 3:28 ("a man is justified by faith without the deeds of the law") is resolved by recognizing the distinct audiences and purposes of their writings. James 1:1 explicitly addresses "the twelve tribes which are scattered abroad"-Israel in dispersion. His emphasis on works demonstrating faith fits Israel's prophetic and kingdom program, where faith had to be validated by works (cf. Matt. 24:13; Acts 3:19-21). James is not laying out the gospel of grace as revealed to Paul, but reinforcing Israel's covenant responsibility of faith proven by deeds.
Paul, by contrast, reveals the "mystery" gospel ( Rom. 16:25; Eph. 3:1-9), hidden until given to him, where justification is by faith alone in Christ's finished work ( 1 Cor. 15:1-4). This is not "overlaying bias," but taking Scripture in its own stated context. All Scripture is indeed inspired and profitable ( 2 Tim. 3:16), but "profitable" does not mean all Scripture is written to us. For example, Leviticus laws or temple sacrifices are not binding today, yet they instruct us about God's holiness. In the same way, James is for our learning, but Paul's epistles are uniquely to the Body of Christ concerning salvation and justification in this dispensation.
Dispensationalism does not diminish the whole Bible; it respects God's progressive revelation. To blend James and Paul as if both are directly prescribing doctrine for the Church today obscures the very clarity Paul magnifies: salvation apart from works. The Spirit does not leave us with contradiction-He calls us to "rightly divide the word of truth" ( 2 Tim. 2:15).
I hope this helps!
Grace and Peace.
Thank you for your reply.
While I do not adhere to the overlaying bias of dispensational doctrine upon Scripture as you indeed do, I appreciate your thoughts on how you interpret Scripture.
I am still working on understanding James 2:24 and Rom. 3:28. I do not agree that James' teaching is for ethnic Israel and Paul's is for Gentile believers. I do not hold to the hermeneutic of keeping Israel and the Church distinct because I do not see this taught in Scripture.
But I do take into account how the epistles identify it's immediate audience, yet we do know that these epistles and the gospels where circulated among the churches, whether in Judea or around the Mediterranean lands, and so this reveals that ALL of the NT Scriptures were intended by the Holy Spirit to be for the whole of the church of that time and also down through the centuries to us to include Jews, Israelites of the 10 tribes, and Gentiles who are believers in Jesus and members of His church forever. I do not see that there is Scripture addressed to unbelieving Israel in these NT writings.
This comment thread is locked. Please enter a new comment below to start a new comment thread.
Note: Comment threads older than 2 months are automatically locked.
Do you have a Bible comment or question?
Posting comments is currently unavailable due to high demand on the server.
Please check back in an hour or more. Thank you for your patience!
Report Comment
Which best represents the problem with the comment?