It's BOTH 20 and 21 isn't it? And it's the 21, not 20, that talks about Jesus. My guess is that if they were to put 20-21 , that would be longer text and ousrbce too much of, or overbalance, the picture. I wouldn't call that biblical ignorance .What worries me far, far more than such gnat-straining is all the camel-swallowing that we music-choosers inflict on our congregations at Christmas, when choosing the heretical docetism of Away in a Manger . (And close behind it in the heresy stakes come Silent Night and Once in Royal .) If we were REALLY worried about biblical ignorance, wouldn't we be better looking a little closer to home?
This comment thread is locked. Please enter a new comment to start a new comment thread.
Enter new comment
This comment thread is locked. Please enter a new comment below to start a new comment thread.
Note: Comment threads older than 2 months are automatically locked.
Do you have a Bible comment or question?
Posting comments is currently unavailable due to high demand on the server.
Please check back in an hour or more. Thank you for your patience!
Report Comment
Which best represents the problem with the comment?